County employees' retirement: Contra Costa County.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and the governing boards of districts within the county, if authorized by the board of supervisors, to provide service retirement allowances for general members based on a formula commonly known as the 2% at age 55 formula and to make a Tier Three program applicable to all new employees and to all current employees in Tier Two, and to provide members in Tier Three or Tier One, or both, with retirement allowances based on the 2% at age 55 benefit formula. This bill would authorize the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and the governing boards of districts within that county, if authorized by the board of supervisors, to negotiate with specified recognized employee organizations representing general members to subject general members who are hired on or after January 1, 2013, or a later date, to a 2% at age 60 formula, known as Tier Four, as specified. Existing law authorizes the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and the governing boards of districts within that county, if authorized by the board of supervisors, to negotiate with a recognized employee organization representing safety members regarding the conditions, as specified, to be required of employees who are or may become subject to the 3% at age 50 formula. This bill would authorize the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and the governing boards of districts within that county, if authorized by the board of supervisors, to negotiate with specified recognized employee organizations representing safety members to subject safety members who are hired on or after January 1, 2013, or a later date, to a 3% at age 55 formula, as specified. The bill would also make related changes.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
May 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Governor
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Last action Aug 21, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 14, 2012 · Assembly Aug 20, 2012
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
May 14, 2012
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
4
Committee
3
Amendments
2
Aug 21, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 20, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-2)
assembly
Jun 20, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 20).
lower
May 25, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E., R. & S.S.
lower
May 14, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
May 8, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3447.) (May 7).
upper
Mar 22, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mark DeSaulnier
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1494
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1494. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline