Food facilities: menu labeling.
Summary
The Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law contains various provisions regarding the contents, packaging, labeling, and advertising of food, drugs, and cosmetics. The California Retail Food Code provides for the regulation of health and sanitation standards for retail food facilities, as defined, by the State Department of Public Health. Under existing law, local health agencies are primarily responsible for enforcing the California Retail Food Code. A violation of any of these provisions is punishable as a misdemeanor. The code requires fish that are received for sale or service to be commercially and legally caught or harvested. The code also imposes various labeling and storage requirements for shellstock. This bill would require a retail food facility, as defined, that offers or sells as a menu item seafood, as defined, to identify specified information regarding the seafood and, if the retail food facility has a drive-through area and uses a menu board to display or list menu items, to disclose on this menu board a statement that this specified information is available upon request. The bill would require the department or local enforcement agencies to enforce these provisions, as specified, and would make a violation an infraction or subject to a civil penalty. The bill would provide an exception to these enforcement provisions for food facilities that were provided inaccurate information by the entity that provided the seafood. By expanding the definition of a crime and imposing additional duties upon local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Last action Apr 26, 2012
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
0
Committee
3
Apr 26, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 5. Noes 3. Page 3307.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Mar 22, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ted Lieu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1486
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1486. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline