Crime victims: restitution.
Summary
Existing law requires the court to order defendants convicted of any crime to pay a fine in the form of a penalty, as specified. Existing law additionally requires the court to order defendants to pay restitution to the victim or victims, as well as a restitution fine. Existing law requires that a person convicted of specified crimes, including counterfeiting products and failing to disclose the origin of a recording or audiovisual work, pay restitution to the owner, lawful producer, or trade association acting on behalf of the owner or lawful producer that suffered economic loss from the violation. Under existing law, the value of each nonconforming article or device is based on the aggregate wholesale value of lawfully manufactured and authorized devices or articles from which sounds or visual images are devised, except in certain circumstances. This bill would specify that possession of nonconforming devices or articles intended for sale constitutes actual economic loss to an owner or lawful producer in the form of displaced legitimate wholesale purchases. The bill would also base the order of restitution on the aggregate wholesale value of lawfully manufactured and authorized devices or articles from which sounds or visual images are devised corresponding to the number of nonconforming devices or articles involved in the offense. The bill would make additional changes to Section 1202.4 of the Penal Code made by SB 1177 to take effect if both bills are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
Apr 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Signed Sep 30, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Apr 26, 2012 · Assembly Aug 20, 2012
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Apr 26, 2012
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
6
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Sep 30, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 36. Noes 1. Page 4699.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 21, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 20, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-5-7)
assembly
Jun 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 26).
lower
May 3, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 26, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Apr 18, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3210.) (April 17).
upper
Mar 22, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Fran Pavley
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1479
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1479. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline