Environmental quality: California Environmental Quality Act: bicycle transportation plan.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA requires the lead agencies to make specified findings in an EIR. Existing law establishes the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) in the Governor's office. Existing law requires OPR to assist with, among other things, the orderly preparation of programs of transportation. Existing law authorizes a local agency that determines that a project is not subject to CEQA pursuant to certain exemptions and approves or determines to carry out that project, to file notice of the determination with the county clerk in the county in which the project is located. This bill, until January 1, 2018, would exempt from CEQA a bicycle transportation plan for an urbanized area, as specified, and would also require a local agency that determines that the bicycle transportation plan is exempt under this provision and approves or determines to carry out that project, to file notice of the determination with OPR and the county clerk. This bill would require OPR to post specified information on its Internet Web site, as prescribed.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Last action Aug 28, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2012
How they voted
35–2
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 39
May 29, 2012
D
Democratic24
91% Yea
R
Republican15
86% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Amendments
3
Aug 20, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 15. Noes 1.) (August 16).
lower
Aug 6, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (July 2).
lower
Jun 26, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Jun 15, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on TRANS. and NAT. RES.
lower
Jun 14, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and TRANS.
lower
May 29, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-2-2)
senate
May 2, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3341.) (April 30).
upper
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1380
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1380. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline