Firearms: lost or stolen: reports.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires each sheriff or police chief executive to submit descriptions of serialized property, or nonserialized property that has been uniquely inscribed, which has been reported stolen, lost, or found directly into the appropriate Department of Justice automated property system for firearms, stolen bicycles, stolen vehicles, or other property. Existing law requires that information about a firearm entered into the automated system for firearms remain in the system until the reported firearm has been found. Existing law requires the Department of Justice to implement an electronic system to receive comprehensive tracing information from each local law enforcement agency and to forward the information to the National Tracing Center. This bill would require every person, with exceptions, to report the theft or loss of a firearm he or she owns or possesses to a local law enforcement agency in the jurisdiction in which the theft or loss occurred within 48 hours of the time he or she knew or reasonably should have known that the firearm had been stolen or lost, and requires every person who has reported a firearm lost or stolen to notify the local law enforcement agency within 48 hours if the firearm is subsequently recovered. The bill would make a violation of these provisions an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed $100 for a first offense, an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000 for a 2nd offense, and a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding 6 months, or by a fine not to exceed $1,000, or both that fine and imprisonment, for a 3rd or subsequent offense. The bill would make it a misdemeanor for any person to make a report to a local law enforcement agency that a firearm has been lost or stolen, knowing the report to be false. By creating new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require every sheriff or police chief to submit a description of each firearm that has been reported lost or stolen directly to the Department of Justice automated property system for firearms. By imposing new duties on local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also require that persons licensed to sell firearms post a warning within the licensed premises in block letters stating the requirement that a lost or stolen firearm be reported to a local law enforcement agency, as specified. (2) Existing law prohibits a person from making an application to purchase more than one handgun within any 30-day period. Existing law makes an exception for the replacement of a handgun when the person's handgun was lost or stolen and the person reported the firearm lost or stolen prior to the completion of the application to purchase. This bill would instead make the exception for the replacement of a lost or stolen handgun applicable when the person has reported the handgun lost or stolen pursuant to the provisions of this bill. (3) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 16520 of the Penal Code proposed by AB 1527, that would become operative only if AB 1527 and this bill are both enacted, both bills become effective on or before January 1, 2012, and this bill is enacted last. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Vetoed
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Vetoed Sep 28, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 14, 2012 · Assembly Aug 22, 2012
How they voted
21–12
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
May 14, 2012
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Sep 28, 2012
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 28, 2012
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 23, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 22. Noes 15. Page 4770.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 22, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-27-2)
assembly
Aug 22, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 9, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 8).
lower
Jun 13, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (June 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 25, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 14, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-12-2)
senate
May 7, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 18, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 16, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3105.) (April 10).
upper
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
upper
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mark DeSaulnier
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1366
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1366. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline