Water corporations.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, gas corporations, telephone corporations, and water corporations, as defined. The Public Utilities Act authorizes the PUC, each commissioner, and each officer and person employed by the PUC at any time to inspect the accounts, books, papers, and documents of any public utility. This authorization applies to inspections of the accounts, books, papers, and documents of any business that is a subsidiary or affiliate of, or a corporation that holds a controlling interest in, an electrical, gas, or telephone corporation. This bill would additionally authorize the inspection of the accounts, books, papers, and documents of any business that is a subsidiary or affiliate of, or a corporation that holds controlling interest in, a water corporation that has 2,000 or more service connections. (2) Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. Existing law, with certain exceptions, prohibits a public utility from changing any rate, except upon a showing before the commission and a finding by the commission that the new rate is justified. With certain exceptions, whenever any electrical, gas, heat, telephone, water, or sewer system corporation files an application to change any rate for the services or commodities furnished by it, existing law requires that the corporation furnish its customers notice of its application to the PUC for approval of the new rate. This bill, for a water corporation with more than 2,000 service connections, would require the notice to include estimated rate impacts on the various customer classes of the corporation. The bill would authorize the commission to require the water corporation to inform customers of the outcome of the general rate case, as prescribed. (3) Existing law requires every electrical, gas, and telephone corporation to annually prepare and submit to the PUC a report describing all significant transactions between the corporation and every subsidiary or affiliate of, or corporation holding a controlling interest in, the electrical, gas, or telephone corporation. Existing law requires that the report identify the nature of the transactions and the terms and conditions applying to them, including the basis upon which cost allocations and transfer pricing were established for the transactions. Existing law requires the PUC to periodically audit all significant transactions between an electrical, gas, or telephone corporation and every subsidiary or affiliate of, or corporation holding a controlling interest in, that electrical, gas, or telephone corporation. Existing law authorizes the commission to utilize the services of an independent auditor, to be selected and supervised by the commission. This bill would make these requirements applicable to water corporations with more than 2,000 service connections. The bill would authorize the commission to direct a water corporation with more than 2,000 service connections, or an electrical, gas, or telephone corporation, to utilize the services of an independent auditor, to be selected and supervised by that water, electrical, gas, or telephone corporation. (4) If the PUC finds and determines that any electrical, gas, or telephone corporation has willfully made an imprudent payment to, or received a less than reasonable payment from, any subsidiary or affiliate of, or corporation holding a controlling interest in, the electrical, gas, or telephone corporation in violation of any rule or order of the PUC, and the corporation has sought to recover the payment in any proceeding before the PUC, existing law authorizes the PUC, following a hearing, to levy a penalty against the corporation not to exceed 3 times the required or prohibited payment if the PUC finds that the payment was made or received by the corporation for the purpose of benefiting its subsidiary, affiliate, or holding corporation. This bill would extend this authority to water corporations with more than 2,000 service connections. (5) Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and certain provisions of the bill would extend existing requirements to water corporations, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the application of a crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Aug 2012
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Signed Aug 29, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2012 · Assembly Aug 16, 2012
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
May 29, 2012
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
7
Committee
5
Amendments
2
Aug 29, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 16, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-1)
assembly
Aug 9, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 8).
lower
Jun 19, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
May 29, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-1)
senate
May 24, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3595.) (May 24).
upper
Apr 26, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 3303.) (April 24).
upper
Apr 4, 2012
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
upper
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bob Huff
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1364
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1364. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline