Removal from office: grand jury accusation.
Summary
Existing law provides for the removal of public officers for willful or corrupt misconduct in office. Existing law provides that an accusation in writing against any officer of a district, county, or city for willful or corrupt misconduct in office may be presented by the grand jury of the county for, or in, which the officer accused is elected or appointed. Existing law authorizes the impaneling of an additional grand jury under specified circumstances. Under existing law, an accusation may not be presented without the concurrence of a specified number of grand jurors. This bill would provide that the grand jury presenting the accusation against an officer for willful or corrupt misconduct in office may also be the additional grand jury impaneled pursuant to those provisions. The bill would require the concurrence of 14 grand jurors in a county in which the required number of grand jurors is 23 in order for an accusation of misconduct against an officer, as described above, to be presented.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Jul 2012
Signed into Law
Jul 2012
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Signed Jul 13, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 14, 2012 · Assembly Jul 2, 2012
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
May 14, 2012
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Jul 13, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 2, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0)
assembly
Jun 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 26).
lower
Jun 18, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 14, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
May 7, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3389.) (May 1).
upper
Mar 27, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3023.) (March 27). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
upper
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Anthony Cannella
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1357
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1357. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline