Peace officer records.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires peace officer or custodial officer personnel records and records maintained by a state or local agency, or information obtained from these records, to be confidential and prohibits disclosure in a criminal or civil proceeding except by discovery. Existing law provides that this prohibition does not apply to investigations or proceedings concerning the conduct of peace officers or custodial officers conducted by a grand jury, district attorney's office, or the Attorney General's office. This bill would instead provide that this prohibition does not apply to investigations or proceedings concerning civil rights violations investigated by the Attorney General's office or the criminal misconduct of peace officers or custodial officers conducted by a grand jury, district attorney's office, or the Attorney General's office. (2) Existing law authorizes a department or agency that employs peace or custodial officers to release factual information concerning a disciplinary investigation if the officer who is the subject of the disciplinary investigation, or the officer's agent or representative, publicly makes a statement he or she knows to be false concerning the investigation or the imposition of disciplinary action and the false statement was published by an established medium of communication, such as television, radio, or a newspaper. This bill would authorize disclosure of factual information concerning a disciplinary investigation if the officer who is the subject of the disciplinary investigation, or the officer's agent or representative, makes a false statement that is published by an Internet Web site affiliated with a newspaper.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Last action Apr 4, 2012
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
11
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Apr 4, 2012
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ed Hernandez
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1353
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1353. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline