SB 1352 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Child abuse: investigation and prosecution: child advocacy centers.

Summary
Existing law states the intent of the Legislature that the law enforcement agencies and the county welfare or probation department of each county develop and implement cooperative arrangements in order to coordinate existing duties in connection with the investigation of suspected child abuse or neglect cases. Existing law requires a local law enforcement agency having jurisdiction over a reported case of child abuse to report to the county welfare or probation department that it is investigating the case, and requires the county welfare department or probation department, in certain cases, to evaluate what action or actions would be in the best interest of the child and to submit its findings to the district attorney, as specified. This bill would authorize each county to establish a child advocacy center to coordinate the investigation and prosecution of child abuse. The bill would provide that if a county establishes a child advocacy center, the center shall consist of a representative from the district attorney's office, the sheriff's department or police department, or both those departments, and child protective services and may also include representatives from medical and mental health, victim advocacy, and any other agency relevant to the identification, investigation, prosecution, and treatment of child abuse. The bill would authorize each county to develop an interagency protocol agreement for the collaborative investigation of child abuse and neglect and would require any member of the child advocacy center to sign the protocol. The bill would require the protocol to define the multidisciplinary team, and to detail how the team will work together, as provided.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Jun 2012
Vetoed
Jul 2012
Introduced Feb 24, 2012 Vetoed Jul 3, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 3, 2012 · Assembly Jun 18, 2012

How they voted

310
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
May 3, 2012
D Democratic23
21 Yea 2
91% Yea
R Republican12
10 Yea 2
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
24
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Jul 3, 2012
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Jul 3, 2012
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Jun 18, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-1)
assembly
Jun 13, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 12).
lower
May 10, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 3, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-4)
senate
Apr 24, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3209.) (April 17).
upper
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and APPR.
upper
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors