Natural resources: Cache Creek Resource Management Plan.
Summary
(1) The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975, governs surface mining operations and reclamation of mined lands, and provides, among other things, for the submission of reclamation plans to, and issuance of permits by, lead agencies to persons engaging in surface mining operations. Until December 31, 2012, a site specific plan in conjunction and consistent with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan is to be considered a functional equivalent of a reclamation plan for purposes of the act. The board of supervisors of the county in which the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan is to be implemented is required, until December 31, 2012, to prepare and forward to the Director of Conservation annually a report containing specified information relating to mining operations. Existing law provides that these provisions shall not become operative until the date the State Mining and Geology Board notifies the Secretary of State that the board has approved an ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors for the County of Yolo that governs in-channel noncommercial extraction activities carried out pursuant to the plan. This bill would delete the requirement regarding the operative date. The bill would extend these provisions until December 31, 2017. By extending the duties of the board of supervisors of the county in which the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan is to be implemented, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the annual report on the Cache Creek Area Plan that is prepared by the County of Yolo staff and submitted to the board of supervisors of the county in which the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan is implemented to also be submitted to the Assembly Natural Resources Committee and the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2011
Committee Review
Jul 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Jul 2011
Signed into Law
Aug 2011
Introduced Jan 27, 2011
Signed Aug 1, 2011
Floor votes · Senate May 9, 2011 · Assembly Jul 14, 2011
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
May 9, 2011
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
5
Committee
6
Aug 1, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 14, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-3)
assembly
Jul 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 6).
lower
Jun 14, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 19, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
May 9, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
May 3, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Apr 12, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 619.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Jan 27, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Lois Wolk
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 133
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 133. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline