Vehicles: traffic violator schools.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the department to charge traffic violator school owners, operators, and instructors fees for certain activities related to traffic violator school programs, including the issuance of a branch or classroom location license. These fees are required to be set to defray the actual cost to the department to administer the traffic violator school program, except for the costs for routine monitoring of instruction. This bill, until January 1, 2015, would revise the activities for which the department is authorized to impose certain of these fees and would authorize the department to charge fees instead for an approval for a branch office or a classroom location or the renewal of an approved branch office or current classroom location. The bill would require all of these fees to be equal to the fees charged for the 2011–12 fiscal year, except the fee for the renewal of an approved current classroom location would be required to be set at $50 per year per location. The bill would, as of January 1, 2015, delete those proposed revisions and would reestablish the fee requirements imposed under existing law. (2) Existing law requires the court to collect a single administrative fee that is assessed against a driver traffic violator who attends traffic violator school, and requires the fee to include the cost of routine monitoring of traffic violator school instruction. This bill, until January 1, 2015, would instead require the amount of the administrative fee assessed and collected by the court to be set by the department at an amount sufficient to defray the actual costs to the department to administer the provisions regulating the traffic school violator program, except for the costs defrayed by the fees authorized for specific department activities described in (1) above. The bill would, as of January 1, 2015, delete that proposed change and would reestablish the fee amount required under existing law.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Last action Aug 16, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2012
How they voted
21–10
Passed
Total votes 31
May 29, 2012
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Amendments
3
Aug 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Aug 8, 2012
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 2, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (June 25).
lower
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
May 29, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-10)
senate
May 24, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3595.) (May 24).
upper
Apr 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3. Page 3315.) (April 24).
upper
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Feb 23, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CK
Christine Kehoe
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1317
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1317. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline