SB 1300 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Interrogation: electronic recordation.

Summary
Existing law provides that under specified conditions the statements of witnesses, victims, or perpetrators of specified crimes may be recorded and preserved by means of videotape. This bill would require the electronic recordation of the entire custodial interrogation of an individual who is in a fixed place of detention, as defined, and who, at the time of the interrogation, is suspected of committing or accused of committing a serious or violent felony. The bill would set forth various exceptions from this requirement, including if the law enforcement officer conducting the interrogation or his or her superior reasonably believes that electronic recording would disclose the identity of a confidential informant or jeopardize the safety of an officer, the individual being interrogated, or another individual. The bill would require the prosecution to show by clear and convincing evidence that an exception applies to justify the failure to make that electronic recording. The bill would also require the interrogating entity to maintain the original or an exact copy of an electronic recording made of the interrogation until the final conclusion of the proceedings, as specified. The bill would require the Judicial Council to develop related jury instructions. The bill would also require the Judicial Council to develop forms to survey interrogations and outcomes in order to ensure compliance with these provisions, as specified. The bill would also require the Department of Justice to develop forms to be submitted to the department in each case of an unrecorded interrogation in order to identify patterns of noncompliance. The bill would make these provisions applicable to juvenile court proceedings, as specified. By imposing these new requirements on local law enforcement, this bill would impose a state‑mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status in committee 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 23, 2012 Last action May 24, 2012
Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
10
Key actions
1
Committee
3
May 24, 2012
Upper · Passed
Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 25, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 3312.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and APPR.
upper
Feb 23, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
EA
Elaine Alquist
DDemocratic
CA
13