Santa Clara Stadium Authority: stadium agreements: enforceable obligations.
Summary
Existing law authorized the City of Santa Clara and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Clara to enter into a joint powers agreement to create and operate a joint powers agency, the Santa Clara Stadium Authority, for the construction, operation, and maintenance of a stadium and related facilities that are suitable for use by a professional football team. Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies, as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies, as defined. Existing law requires the successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies and to, among other things, make payments due for enforceable obligations, as defined. Existing law requires the Controller to review the activities of successor agencies to determine if an asset transfer that was not made pursuant to an enforceable obligation occurred after January 31, 2012, between the successor agency and the city, county, or city and county, as defined, that created the redevelopment agency. If such a transfer occurred, the Controller is required to order the return of available assets to the successor agency. This bill would exclude the Santa Clara Stadium Authority from the definition of "city, county, or city and county" for these purposes. The bill would further provide that agreements entered into prior to June 27, 2011, between a former redevelopment agency and the Santa Clara Stadium Authority to contribute funding to the development of a stadium constitute enforceable obligations that shall not be subject to termination. The bill would make findings regarding the need for special legislation.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Last action Aug 6, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 21, 2012
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
May 21, 2012
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
3
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Jun 28, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 4, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
May 21, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
May 15, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3514.) (May 14).
upper
May 1, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3302.) (April 25).
upper
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 23, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
EA
Elaine Alquist
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1245
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1245. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline