Land use: general plan: safety element: fire hazard impacts.
Summary
(1) The Planning and Zoning Law requires the legislative body of a city or county to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan that includes various elements, including, among others, a safety element for the protection of the community from unreasonable risks associated with, among other things, wildland and urban fires. The safety element includes requirements for state responsibility areas, as defined, and very high fire hazard severity zones, as defined. This bill would revise the safety element requirements for state responsibility areas and very high fire hazard severity zones, as specified, and require the safety element, upon the next revision of the housing element on or after January 1, 2014, to be reviewed and updated as necessary to address the risk of fire in state responsibility areas and very high fire hazard severity zones, taking into account specified considerations, including, among others, the most recent version of the Office of Planning and Research's "Fire Hazard Planning" document. The bill would also require the office to, at the next update of its general plan guidelines, include these provisions, or a reference to these provisions and any other materials related to fire hazards or fire safety it deems appropriate. By imposing new duties on a city or county with regard to reviewing and updating its general plan, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The Subdivision Map Act requires the legislative body of a city or county to deny approval of a tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, unless it makes certain findings. This bill would require the legislative body of a county to make 3 specified findings before approving a tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, for an area located in a state responsibility area or a very high fire hazard severity zone, as defined. The bill would provide that this provision does not supersede the requirements of local ordinances and specified regulations that provide equivalent or more stringent minimum requirements. (3) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA requires the Office of Planning and Research to prepare and develop guidelines for the implementation of CEQA by public agencies. This bill would require the office, on or after January 1, 2013, at the time of the next update of the guidelines for implementing CEQA, in cooperation with the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, to prepare, develop, and transmit to the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency recommended proposed changes or amendments to the initial study checklist for the inclusion of questions related to fire hazard impacts for projects in state responsibility areas and very high fire hazard severity zones. The bill would also require the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to certify and adopt these recommended proposed changes or amendments. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Signed Sep 13, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2012 · Assembly Aug 23, 2012
How they voted
23–8
Passed
Total votes 31
May 30, 2012
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
63% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
37
Key actions
7
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Sep 13, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 27. Noes 9. Page 4851.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 24, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 23, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (47-21-2)
assembly
Aug 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 16).
lower
Aug 8, 2012
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 3, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 13, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (June 13). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and NAT. RES.
lower
May 30, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-8)
senate
May 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 3594.) (May 24).
upper
Apr 23, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1. Page 3206.) (April 18).
upper
Mar 27, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3022.) (March 27). Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Mar 12, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on N.R. & W. and GOV. & F.
upper
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and N.R. & W.
upper
Feb 23, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CK
Christine Kehoe
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1241
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1241. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline