Horse racing: parimutuel pool funds.
Summary
Existing law, the Horse Racing Law, generally regulates horse racing and vests the administration and enforcement of the Horse Racing Law in the California Horse Racing Board. A violation of the act, where no other penalty is expressed, is a misdemeanor. Existing law requires every association that conducts a racing meeting to deduct 15% of the total amount handled in conventional parimutuel pool and 16.75% of the total amount handled in exotic parimutuel pools and to distribute the moneys as specified. Existing law requires any fair racing association to additionally deduct 1% from the total amount handled in its daily conventional and exotic parimutuel pools, and provides for the deposit of the moneys in the Fair and Exposition Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, for expenditure for the construction or operation of recreational and cultural facilities of general public interest. This bill would instead require that the 1% deducted from the total amount handled in its daily conventional and exotic parimutuel pools be distributed to the fair that conducted the racing meeting and to the horsemen and horsewomen who participated in the racing meeting. The bill would specify that 50% of this amount, would be payable to the fair as commissions, and 50% to the horsemen and horsewomen as purses. Because a violation of these provisions would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Last action Aug 16, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2012
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
May 29, 2012
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
3
Committee
7
Aug 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Aug 8, 2012
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 28, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
May 29, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
May 24, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3593.) (May 24).
upper
Mar 27, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 3021.) (March 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Feb 23, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1227
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1227. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline