Housing Opportunity and Market Stabilization (HOMeS) Trust Fund Act of 2012.
Summary
Under existing law, there are programs providing assistance for, among other things, emergency housing, multifamily housing, farmworker housing, home ownership for very low and low-income households, and downpayment assistance for first-time homebuyers. Existing law also authorizes the issuance of bonds in specified amounts pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law. Existing law requires that proceeds from the sale of these bonds be used to finance various existing housing programs, capital outlay related to infill development, brownfield cleanup that promotes infill development, and housing-related parks. This bill would enact the Housing Opportunity and Market Stabilization (HOMeS) Trust Fund Act of 2012. The bill would make legislative findings and declarations relating to the need for establishing permanent, ongoing sources of funding dedicated to affordable housing development. The bill would impose a fee, except as provided, of $75 to be paid at the time of the recording of every real estate instrument, paper, or notice required or permitted by law to be recorded. By imposing new duties on counties with respect to the imposition of the recording fee, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would require that revenues from this fee be sent quarterly to the Department of Housing and Community Development for deposit in the Housing Opportunity and Market Stabilization (HOMeS) Trust Fund, which the bill would create within the State Treasury. The bill would provide that moneys in the fund may be expended for supporting affordable housing, administering housing programs, and the cost of periodic audits, as specified. The bill would impose certain auditing and reporting requirements. This bill would result in a change in state taxes for the purpose of increasing state revenues within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIII A of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
2 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Apr 2012
Senate Failed
May 2012
Governor
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Last action May 31, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 31, 2012
How they voted
23–11
Failed · 1 other
Total votes 35
May 31, 2012
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
1
Committee
3
Amendments
1
May 31, 2012
Vote failed
Senate Vote: fail (23-11-1)
senate
May 24, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3593.) (May 24).
upper
Apr 26, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3304.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 25, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 3314.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and GOV. & F.
upper
Feb 23, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1220
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1220. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline