Charter schools: legal claims and actions against public entities: analysis by California Law Revision Commission.
Summary
The Charter Schools Act of 1992 authorizes any one or more persons to submit a petition to the governing board of a school district to establish a charter school that operates independently from the existing school district structure as a method of accomplishing specified goals. Existing law requires a charter school to comply with its charter and exempts charter schools from the laws governing school districts except those of the Charter Schools Act of 1992, those establishing minimum age for public school attendance, specified building code regulations, and other specified laws. Existing law deems a charter school to be a school district for specified purposes, including for purposes of the state's minimum funding obligation for school districts and community colleges. Existing law governs the tort liability and immunity of, and claims and actions against, public entities and their officers and employees. A public entity, as defined, is not liable for an injury, except as otherwise provided by statute, whether the injury arises out of an act or omission of the public entity or a public employee or any other person. Existing law establishes in the state government the California Law Revision Commission and requires the commission to file a report at each regular session of the Legislature that contains a calendar of topics selected by it for study. Existing law requires the commission also to study any topic that the Legislature, by concurrent resolution or statute, refers to it for study. Existing law requires the commission to submit its reports, and its recommendations as to revision of the laws, to the Governor and the Legislature, and to distribute them to the Governor, the Members of the Legislature, and the heads of all state departments. This bill would require the commission, by January 15, 2013, to submit to the Legislature its analysis of the legal and policy implications of treating a charter school as a public entity for purposes of the law governing the tort liability and immunity of, and claims and actions against, public entities and their officers and employees.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2012
Last action Jun 19, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2012
How they voted
31–0
Passed
Total votes 31
May 29, 2012
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Jun 19, 2012
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 29, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0)
senate
May 21, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 9, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3459.) (May 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 1, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 22, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
MW
Mimi Walters
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1213
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1213. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline