Restitution for crime victims.
Summary
Existing law requires the court to order a person who is convicted of a crime to pay a restitution fine, as prescribed, and restitution to the victim or victims for the full amount of economic loss, unless the court finds compelling and extraordinary reasons for not doing so and states those reasons on the record. Existing law requires every employer except the state to secure the payment of compensation by being insured against liability, or by securing a certificate of consent to self-insure. Under existing law, payment, in whole or in part, of compensation by either the employer or the insurer is a bar to recovery against each of them of the amount paid. This bill would prohibit, in cases where an employer is convicted of a crime against an employee, a payment to the employee or the employee's dependent that is made by the employer's workers' compensation insurance carrier from being used to offset the restitution owed to the victim unless the court finds that the defendant substantially met the obligation to pay premiums for that insurance coverage. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1202.4 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 1479, to become operative only if SB 1479 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
Apr 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 22, 2012
Signed Sep 30, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Apr 26, 2012 · Assembly Aug 20, 2012
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Apr 26, 2012
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
7
Committee
5
Amendments
3
Sep 30, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4677.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 21, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 20, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-1-4)
assembly
Jun 27, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 27).
lower
Jun 18, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on INS. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 12).
lower
May 3, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and INS.
lower
Apr 26, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Apr 18, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3209.) (April 17).
upper
Apr 11, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3122.) (April 11). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 1, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. & I.R. and PUB. S.
upper
Feb 22, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1177
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1177. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline