Communications: Voice over Internet Protocol and Internet Protocol enabled communications service.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including telephone corporations, as defined. This bill would, until January 1, 2020, prohibit the commission from regulating Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) and Internet Protocol enabled service (IP enabled service) , as defined, except as required or delegated by federal law or expressly provided otherwise in statute. The bill would prohibit any department, agency, commission, or political subdivision of the state from enacting, adopting, or enforcing any law, rule, regulation, ordinance, standard, order, or other provision having the force or effect of law, that regulates VoIP or other IP enabled service, unless required or delegated by federal law or expressly authorized by statute. The bill would specify certain areas of law that are expressly applicable to VoIP and IP enabled service providers. The bill would provide that its limitations upon the commission's regulation of VoIP and IP enabled services do not affect the commission's existing authority over non-VoIP and other non-IP enabled wireline or wireless service and do not affect the enforcement of any state or federal criminal law or local ordinances of general applicability that apply to the conduct of business, the California Environmental Quality Act, or a local utility user tax, among other things.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 22, 2012
Signed Sep 28, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 30, 2012 · Assembly Aug 20, 2012
How they voted
26–6
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
May 30, 2012
D
Democratic23
65% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
4
Sep 28, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 28. Noes 7. Page 4677.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 21, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 20, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (56-11-5)
assembly
Aug 9, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 1.) (August 8).
lower
Jun 20, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 1.) (June 18).
lower
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
May 30, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-6-3)
senate
May 29, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3591.) (May 24).
upper
May 14, 2012
Committee
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 2. Noes 5. Page 3513.) Reconsideration granted.
upper
Apr 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 3205.) (April 17).
upper
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
upper
Mar 1, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 22, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 10 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Alex Padilla
DDemocratic
Co
CD
Curren D Price
DDemocratic
Co
FM
Fiona Ma
DDemocratic
Co
Isadore Hall
DDemocratic
Co
Jean Fuller
RRepublican
Co
JG
Jeff Gorell
RRepublican
Co
JB
Joan Buchanan
DDemocratic
Co
Lou Correa
DDemocratic
Co
Roger Hernández
DDemocratic
Co
Steve Bradford
DDemocratic
Co
Ted Lieu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1161
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1161. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline