SB 1155 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Vehicles: combination length.

Summary
(1) Existing law prohibits any combination of vehicles coupled together, including any attachments, from exceeding a total length of 65 feet, with certain, specified exemptions. Existing law further exempts a combination of vehicles coupled together, including attachments from the specified length limitation, and authorizes the combination to have a length of not more than 75 feet if the combination consists of a truck tractor, a semitrailer, or a semitrailer or trailer, and the length of neither the semitrailer nor the trailer in the combination of vehicles exceeds 28 feet 6 inches. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, exempt from the length limitation a combination of vehicles coupled together, including attachments not more than 75 feet in total length that (1) consist of a motortruck and two trailers; (2) includes a trailer in the combination that does not exceed 28 feet 6 inches; (3) is used exclusively to transport agricultural products from the field to either the first point of handling and return or to a designated truck route and return, and each direction of transport does not exceed a specified amount of miles; (4) is not operated on a highway designated by the United States Department of Transportation as a national network route; (5) does not exceed a speed of 50 miles per hour when operating on a highway; (6) successfully completes a commercial vehicle safety alliance inspection conducted by the Department of the California Highway Patrol; and (7) operates on the highways only after the development of safe routing techniques, as specified. The bill would also limit the application of this exemption to the County of San Benito and to cities in that county upon adoption of the exemption by ordinance or resolution. The bill would require the Department of the California Highway Patrol, in consultation with the Department of Transportation, to conduct a study of the effect that the exemption has on public safety, as prescribed, and to report the results of the study to the Legislature and the Governor on or before April 1, 2014. (2) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations regarding the need for special legislation. (3) The bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency measure.
Bill status died 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2012 Last action Jun 18, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 7, 2012

How they voted

219
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
May 7, 2012
D Democratic20
10 Yea 9 Nay 1
50% Yea
R Republican11
11 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
14
Key actions
2
Committee
5
Jun 18, 2012
Committee
Set, second hearing. Failed passage in committee.
lower
May 17, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
May 7, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-9-1)
senate
May 1, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 3388.) (April 30).
upper
Apr 11, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 4. Page 3123.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 1, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Feb 21, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Anthony Cannella
Anthony Cannella
RRepublican
CA
12