Crimes: public safety omnibus.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires that any employer who willfully fails to pay and has the ability to pay a final court judgment or final order issued by the Labor Commissioner for all wages due to an employee who has been discharged or who has quit within 90 days of the date that the judgment was entered or the order became final is guilty of a misdemeanor. If the total amount of wages due is less than $1,000, upon conviction, the employer is required to be fined not less than $1,000 nor more than $10,000, or imprisoned in a county jail for not more than 6 months, for each offense. Under existing law, a misdemeanor, unless otherwise specified, is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding 6 months, or a fine not exceeding $1,000, or by both that fine and imprisonment. This bill would, if the total amount of wages due is exactly $1,000, increase the maximum fine from no more than $1,000, to an amount not less than $1,000, nor more than $10,000. (2) Existing law authorizes a prosecutor to file specified misdemeanors, such as illegal gaming, as infractions unless the defendant elects to have the case proceed as a misdemeanor, and authorizes the court, with the consent of the defendant, to determine that the offense is an infraction. Existing law requires that cases on a court's calendar be disposed of in a certain order, such as prosecution for felonies where the defendant is in custody being tried first. This bill would make nontechnical changes to these provisions by updating cross-references and deleting obsolete provisions. (3) Existing law makes the crime of battery committed against any one of certain persons who are or who have been in a specified domestic relationship with the defendant, such as a spouse or former spouse, punishable by a fine or by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment. Existing law makes it a felony for a person to willfully inflict corporal injury resulting in a traumatic condition upon a person who is or has been in a specified domestic relationship with the defendant, such as a spouse or a cohabitant, punishable by imprisonment in the state prison or a county jail, or a fine, or both imprisonment and a fine. Existing law also requires a peace officer, when that officer is called out on a domestic violence call, to make a good faith effort to inform a victim of his or her right to make a citizen's arrest. This bill would create an exception to the provision requiring a peace officer to make a good faith effort to inform a victim of his or her right to make a citizen's arrest when the officer makes an arrest for the crimes of domestic violence described above. (4) Existing law establishes a system of risk assessment of sex offenders and requires the use of the State Authorized Risk Assessment Tool for Sex Offenders (SARATSO) to assess specific risks, including future violence. Existing law requires the Department of Justice, on or before January 1, 2013, to make available to the public via the Internet Web site information regarding the risk assessment of registered sex offenders, including information regarding an elevated risk level based on the SARATSO future violence tool. This bill would delete the requirement that the department include information regarding an elevated risk level based on the SARATSO future violence tool on the Internet Web site. (5) Existing law provides that a grand juror who is a current employee of, or a former or retired employee last employed within the prior 3 years by, an agency within the investigative jurisdiction of the civil grand jury to inform the foreperson and court of that fact and recuse himself or herself from participating in any grand jury civil investigation of that agency. This bill would define the term "agency" for purposes of that provision to mean a department or operational part of a government entity, such as a city or county, as specified. (6) This bill would also make technical and clarifying changes.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 21, 2012
Signed Sep 30, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2012 · Assembly Aug 22, 2012
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
May 29, 2012
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Sep 30, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 23, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4763.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 22, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-1)
assembly
Aug 22, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 15, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 8).
lower
Jun 27, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 29, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-1)
senate
May 23, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 22, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
upper
Apr 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3311.) (April 24).
upper
Mar 1, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 21, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1144
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1144. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline