SB 111 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Civil rights: language restrictions.

Summary
The Unruh Civil Rights Act generally prohibits business establishments from discriminating on the basis of sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, or medical condition. The act provides civil remedies for violations of its provisions. Under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, it is an unlawful employment practice for an employer to adopt or enforce a policy that prohibits the use of any language in the workplace, except if that policy is justified by business necessity, as defined, and prescribed notice of the policy and consequences for violation of the policy is given to employees. This bill would make it a violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act to adopt or enforce a policy that requires, limits, or prohibits the use of any language in or with a business establishment, unless the policy is justified by a business necessity, as defined, and notification has been provided to persons subject to the language restriction or requirement of the circumstances and the time when the language restriction or requirement is to be observed and of the consequences for its violation. The bill would define business necessity to require, among other things, that the language restriction or requirement is necessary for the safe and efficient operation of the business and that an equally effective, but less discriminatory, alternative practice does not exist. The bill would provide for an award of damages, and attorney's fees as may be determined by the court, for a violation of its provisions.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Senate Passage
Apr 2011
Assembly Passage
Jul 2011
Vetoed
Feb 2012
Introduced Jan 18, 2011 Vetoed Feb 29, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly Jul 11, 2011

How they voted

4323
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 70
Jul 11, 2011
D Democratic44
43 Yea 1
97% Yea
R Republican26
23 Nay 3
88% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
27
Key actions
5
Committee
5
Amendments
2
Feb 29, 2012
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Feb 29, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
upper
Sep 6, 2011
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 6, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 23. Noes 15. Page 1913.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jul 11, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-23-4)
assembly
Jul 11, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 14).
lower
Apr 28, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 6, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 559.) (April 5).
upper
Mar 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jan 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors

Sponsors