Pharmacy: clinics.
Summary
Existing law, the Pharmacy Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of the practice of pharmacy by the California State Board of Pharmacy and makes a knowing violation of its provisions a crime. Existing law authorizes a surgical clinic, as defined, that is licensed by the board to purchase drugs at wholesale for administration or dispensing, under the direction of a physician and surgeon, to patients registered for care at the surgical clinic. Existing law prohibits a surgical clinic from operating without a license issued by the board. Existing law requires these surgical clinics to comply with various regulatory requirements and to maintain specified records. Existing law authorizes the board to inspect a surgical clinic at any time in order to determine whether a surgical clinic is operating in compliance with certain requirements. This bill would expand these provisions to additionally authorize an outpatient setting or an ambulatory surgical center, as specified, to purchase drugs at wholesale for administration or dispensing, subject to the requirements applicable to surgical clinics. The bill would delete the requirement that a surgical clinic be licensed by the board in order to operate. The bill would specify that the board is authorized to inspect only an outpatient setting, an ambulatory surgical care center, or a surgical clinic that is licensed by the board. Existing law requires every outpatient setting which is accredited to be inspected by the accreditation agency, as defined, and authorizes an outpatient setting to be inspected by the Medical Board of California. Existing law requires the accreditation agency to provide the outpatient setting with notice of any deficiencies and requires the outpatient setting to agree with the accreditation agency on a plan of correction. Existing law requires the accrediting agency to send a list of deficiencies and the corrective action to the Medical Board of California. Existing law requires the accreditation agency to report to the Medical Board of California if the outpatient setting has been issued a reprimand or if the outpatient setting's certification of accreditation has been suspended or revoked or if the outpatient setting has been placed on probation. Existing law makes a willful violation of those provisions governing outpatient settings a crime. This bill would additionally require the accrediting agency to send a list of deficiencies and the corrective action to the California State Board of Pharmacy if an outpatient setting is licensed to purchase drugs at wholesale for administration or dispensing, as described above. The bill would also require the accreditation agency to report to the California State Board of Pharmacy if an outpatient setting has been issued such a license and the outpatient setting has been issued a reprimand or if the outpatient setting's certification of accreditation has been suspended or revoked or if the outpatient setting has been placed on probation. Because a knowing violation of these requirements by outpatient settings and ambulatory surgical centers, and a willful violation of these requirements by accreditation agencies, would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 16, 2012
Signed Sep 22, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 3, 2012 · Assembly Aug 21, 2012
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 35
May 3, 2012
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
75% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Sep 22, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4682.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 21, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-3)
assembly
Aug 21, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 16).
lower
Aug 8, 2012
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 5, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (July 3).
lower
Jun 12, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 12). Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
May 10, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & C.P. and HEALTH.
lower
May 3, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-5)
senate
May 1, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3387.) (April 30).
upper
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3086.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 1, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Feb 16, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1095
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1095. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline