Reports of death, injury, and abuse: developmental centers and state hospitals: mandated reporters.
Summary
Existing law vests in the State Department of Developmental Services jurisdiction over state hospitals referred to as developmental centers for the provision of residential care to persons with developmental disabilities. Existing law requires a developmental center to immediately report all resident deaths and serious injuries of unknown origin to the appropriate local law enforcement agency. Existing law establishes the Office of Protective Services within the State Department of Developmental Services. This bill would rename a certain position within the Office of Protective Services as the Director of Protective Services, require the director to meet specified qualifications, and require that the director be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Secretary of California Health and Human Services, as specified. This bill would require the department to report certain events involving death or harm involving a developmental center resident to a designated protection and advocacy agency. The bill also would require the State Department of State Hospitals to report the same categories of events to the protection and advocacy agency, with respect to a resident of a state mental hospital. Existing law requires specified people, known as mandated reporters, to report cases of elder or dependent adult abuse, as defined. Failure to make a report as required by existing law is a misdemeanor. This bill would require mandated reporters in the State Department of Developmental Services to immediately report suspected abuse to the Office of Protective Services or to the local law enforcement agency. By creating new duties for local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 4427.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by SB 1522, to be operative only if SB 1522 and this bill are both enacted, both bills become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is enacted last. This bill would also incorporate additional changes to Section 15630 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 40, to be operative only if AB 40 and this bill are both enacted, both bills become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 8, 2012
Signed Sep 27, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2012 · Assembly Aug 22, 2012
How they voted
29–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
Aug 23, 2012
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
38
Key actions
7
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Sep 27, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 23, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-2)
senate
Aug 23, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4767.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 22, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-2)
assembly
Aug 22, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 9, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 8).
lower
Jun 27, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 26, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Jun 11, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and HUM. S.
lower
May 21, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 9, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3446.) (May 8).
upper
Apr 25, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3308.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and PUB. S.
upper
Feb 16, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 8, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CL
Carol Liu
DDemocratic
Co
Bill Emmerson
RRepublican
Co
CC
Connie Conway
RRepublican
Co
Joel Anderson
RRepublican
Co
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1051
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1051. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline