Emergency services: seniors.
Summary
Existing law authorizes use of the Emergency Alert System to inform the public of local, state, and national emergencies. Existing law requires a law enforcement agency to activate the Emergency Alert System within the appropriate area if that agency determines that a child 17 years of age or younger, or an individual with a proven mental or physical disability, has been abducted and is in imminent danger of serious bodily injury or death, and there is information available that, if disseminated to the general public, could assist in the safe recovery of that person. This bill would require that if a person is reported missing to a law enforcement agency, and that agency determines that certain requirements are met, including, among others, that the missing person is 65 years of age or older, the law enforcement agency shall request the California Highway Patrol to activate a Silver Alert. The bill would require the California Highway Patrol to activate a Silver Alert upon request if it concurs with the law enforcement agency that specified requirements are met. The bill would require the California Highway Patrol to, upon activation of a Silver Alert, take certain actions to assist the agency investigating the disappearance. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2016.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 7, 2012
Signed Sep 27, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2012 · Assembly Aug 22, 2012
How they voted
29–1
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
May 29, 2012
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Sep 27, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 23, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4767.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 22, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-3)
assembly
Aug 22, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (August 16).
lower
Aug 8, 2012
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 19, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 29, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-1-1)
senate
May 24, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3589.) (May 24).
upper
Apr 10, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 3104.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 19, 2012
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 16, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 7, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1047
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1047. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline