Community redevelopment.
Summary
The Community Redevelopment Law authorizes the establishment of redevelopment agencies in communities to address the effects of blight, and, among other things, provides that an action may be brought to review the validity of specified agency actions, findings, or determinations that occurred after January 1, 2011, within 2 years of the triggering event. This bill would toll the time limit for bringing an action until the Department of Finance issues a finding of completion to the successor agency. Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community development agencies, as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies, as defined. Existing law requires successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies and to, among other things, make payments due for enforceable obligations, as defined, perform obligations required pursuant to any enforceable obligation, dispose of all assets of the former redevelopment agency, and to remit unencumbered balances of redevelopment agency funds, including housing funds, to the county auditor-controller for distribution to taxing entities. Existing law authorizes the city, county, or city and county that authorized the creation of a redevelopment agency to retain the housing assets, functions, and powers previously performed by the redevelopment agency, excluding amounts on deposit in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. The bill would modify provisions relating to the transfer of housing responsibilities associated with dissolved redevelopment agencies and would define the term "housing asset" for these purposes. The bill would impose new requirements on successor agencies with regard to the submittal of the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule, the conducting of a due diligence review to determine the unobligated balances available for transfer to affected taxing entities, and the recovery and subsequent remittance of funds determined to have been transferred absent an enforceable obligation. The bill would authorize the Department of Finance to issue a finding of completion to a successor agency that completes the due diligence review and meets other requirements. Upon receiving a finding of completion, the bill would authorize the successor agency to participate in a loan repayment program and limited property management activities. Existing law authorizes the Department of Finance and the Controller to require any documents associated with enforceable obligations to be provided to them in a manner of their choosing. The bill would authorize the county auditor-controller and the department, under specified circumstances, to require the return of funds improperly spent or transferred to a public entity and would authorize the department and the Controller to require the State Board of Equalization and the county auditor-controller to offset sales and use tax and property tax allocations, respectively, to the local agency. The bill would authorize the Controller to review the activities of a successor agency to determine if an improper asset transfer had occurred between the successor agency and the city or county that created the former redevelopment agency, and would require the Controller to order the return of these assets if such an asset transfer did occur. The bill would impose new requirements on the county auditor-controller relating to the allocation of property tax revenues to affected taxing entities during a specified timeframe. By imposing additional duties upon local public officials, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would appropriate up to $22,000,000 to the Department of Finance from the General Fund for costs associated with the bill, as specified. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Mar 2012
Senate Passage
Mar 2012
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 6, 2012
Last action Jun 27, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Mar 22, 2012
How they voted
21–9
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 35
Mar 22, 2012
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
75% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Mar 26, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
lower
Mar 22, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-9-5)
senate
Feb 16, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 6, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1024
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1024. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline