Athlete agents: conflicts of interest.
Summary
Existing law, the Miller-Ayala Athlete Agents Act, the violation of which is a crime, regulates specified activities of an athlete agent in representing or seeking to represent student athletes and professional athletes. Under this act, an agent is prohibited from having an ownership or financial interest in any entity that is directly involved in the same sport as a person the agent represents, as specified. This bill would instead prohibit an athlete agent from having an ownership or financial interest in an entity that directly employs athletes in the same sport as a person the agent represents, as specified. Existing law prohibits an athlete agent from dividing fees with or receiving compensation from a professional sports league, team, or other organization or its representatives or employees. This bill would limit the prohibition on an athlete agent dividing fees or receiving compensation to fees or compensation directly related to on-field activities of athletes or other representation of the league, team, or organization directly related to athlete employment. This bill would repeal an obsolete provision.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2011
Committee Review
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Apr 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Signed into Law
Jul 2011
Introduced Jan 11, 2011
Signed Jul 8, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly Jun 23, 2011
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Apr 14, 2011
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
5
Committee
5
Jul 7, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 23, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-0-9)
assembly
Jun 21, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 21).
lower
Jun 14, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M.
lower
May 9, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M.
lower
Apr 14, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Apr 5, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 540.) (April 4).
upper
Jan 20, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Jan 11, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ellen Corbett
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 101
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 101. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline