A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by amending Section 8 of Article II thereof, relating to initiatives.
Summary
The California Constitution provides that the electors may propose statutes or amendments to the state constitution through the initiative process by presenting to the Secretary of State a petition that sets forth the text of the proposed statute or amendment to the Constitution and is certified to have been signed by a certain number of electors. This measure would require the Legislative Analyst to review an initiative measure not later than 15 days after its qualification for the ballot, and report the results of the review to the Secretary of State. This measure would prohibit an initiative measure that the Legislative Analyst determines would result in a net increase in state or local government costs exceeding $5,000,000, other than costs attributable to the issuance, sale, or repayment of bonds, from being submitted to the electors or having any effect unless the Legislative Analyst determines that the initiative measure provides for additional revenues in an amount that meets or exceeds the net increase in costs. This requirement would provide for an annual adjustment to the amount of that cost threshold, and would not apply to, or have any effect on, an initiative measure that reduces tax revenues or fees.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2010
Committee Review
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Jul 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Dec 6, 2010
Last action Jul 14, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly Jul 11, 2011
How they voted
45–16
Passed · 9 other
Total votes 70
Jul 11, 2011
D
Democratic44
93% Yea
R
Republican26
61% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
4
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Jul 11, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-16-9)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Be adopted. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27).
lower
May 27, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 23, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Be adopted as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (May 17).
lower
May 11, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Apr 14, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Dec 7, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 6.
lower
1 primary · 13 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike Gatto
DDemocratic
Co
BB
Bob Blumenfield
DDemocratic
Co
BL
Bonnie Lowenthal
DDemocratic
Co
CS
Cameron Smyth
RRepublican
Co
Fran Pavley
DDemocratic
Co
JW
Jared William Huffman
DDemocratic
Co
JG
Jeff Gorell
RRepublican
Co
JS
Jose Solorio
DDemocratic
Co
KO
Kristin Olsen
RRepublican
Co
Mark DeSaulnier
DDemocratic
Co
MH
Mary Hayashi
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about ACA 6
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand ACA 6. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline