AB 976 California Assembly · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Public contracts: consulting services: community choice aggregators.

Summary
Existing law prohibits a person, firm, or subsidiary thereof, which has been awarded a consulting services contract, from submitting a bid for, or being awarded a contract for, the provision of services, procurement of goods or supplies, or any other related action which is required, suggested, or otherwise deemed appropriate in the end product of the consulting services contract, except as specified. The Public Utilities Act provides that customers of an electrical corporation are entitled to aggregate their electric loads as members of their local community with community choice aggregators. It authorizes public entities to serve as a community choice aggregator under specified conditions. This bill would prohibit a person, firm, or subsidiary thereof, which has been awarded a consulting services contract for advising a public entity on the feasibility of creating a community choice aggregator, as defined, from submitting a bid for, or being awarded a contract for, any work, including the procurement of electric supply and renewable energy credits, or any other related action that is required, suggested, or otherwise deemed appropriate in the end product of the consulting services contract. By imposing new restrictions on local government entities with respect to their contract procedures, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Vetoed
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 18, 2011 Vetoed Sep 27, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 22, 2012 · Assembly May 31, 2011

How they voted

22–9
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Aug 22, 2012
D Democratic23
14 Yea 6 Nay 3
60% Yea
R Republican12
8 Yea 3 Nay 1
66% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
26
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Sep 27, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Sep 27, 2012
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 27, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 64. Noes 9. Page 6296.).
lower
Aug 22, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-9-4)
senate
Aug 22, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 2).
upper
Jun 21, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (June 11).
upper
Jul 5, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 21, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
May 31, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (54-9-9)
assembly
May 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 18).
lower
May 5, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 2.) (May 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Mar 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Isadore Hall
Isadore Hall
DDemocratic
CA
35