Keeping Adults Free from Institutions program.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services are provided to qualified, low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law provides, to the extent permitted by federal law, that adult day health care (ADHC) be excluded from coverage under the Medi-Cal program. This bill would provide that it is the intent of the Legislature to create the Keeping Adults Free from Institutions (KAFI) program, which shall be a new program to provide services in the community that are designed to prevent institutionalization, and that the KAFI program be established as quickly as possible to minimize any disruption in services resulting from the elimination of ADHC as a Medi-Cal benefit. This bill would prohibit the KAFI program from being implemented until federal approval is obtained, and provide that the KAFI program is to be implemented only to the extent that federal financial participation is available. This bill would require the department to submit, on or before September 1, 2011, an application to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to implement the KAFI program. This bill would require the KAFI program to utilize licensed adult day health centers to provide a well-defined scope of specified services for Medi-Cal beneficiaries who have been assessed to be at significant risk of institutionalization. This bill would require the department to consult with interested stakeholders and the Legislature in developing the application to CMS and would authorize the department to implement these provisions by means of a state plan amendment or federal waiver, or combination thereof. This bill would appropriate $1,000 to the department for administration. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2011
Committee Review
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Feb 2011
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Vetoed
Jul 2011
Introduced Jan 10, 2011
Vetoed Jul 25, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly Feb 22, 2011
How they voted
41–0
Passed · 28 other
Total votes 69
Feb 22, 2011
D
Democratic44
93% Yea
R
Republican25
0% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Jul 25, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Jun 15, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 54. Noes 24. Page 1950.).
lower
Jun 13, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 15 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Apr 11, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
Mar 16, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (March 16).
upper
Mar 16, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
upper
Feb 22, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (41-0-28)
assembly
Feb 18, 2011
Committee
Without reference to committee.
lower
Jan 11, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 10.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 96
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 96. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline