Transportation omnibus bill.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Sacramento Regional Transit District Act, creates the Sacramento Regional Transit District, with specified powers and duties relative to providing transit services in the Sacramento region. Existing law provides that the district is comprised of specified cities and unincorporated territories in the Counties of Sacramento and Yolo. Existing law sets forth provisions for transition from the Sacramento Transit Authority to the district and also sets forth provisions applicable to the establishment of the first board of the district. This bill would provide that the district includes the Cities of Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Rancho Cordova, and West Sacramento. The bill would delete obsolete provisions relating to the transition from the authority to the district and establishment of the district's first board. The California Constitution prohibits a local government, as defined, from imposing any special tax unless it is approved by a 23 vote of the electorate. The Sacramento Regional Transit District Act prohibits the district from imposing or collecting any property tax within any city or unincorporated area of a county unless it is approved by a majority of the voters of the city or unincorporated area, as specified. This bill would make conforming changes to the Sacramento Regional Transit District Act indicating that the district may not impose or collect any property tax within any city or unincorporated area of a county unless it is approved by a 23 vote of the electorate. Existing law authorizes the Sacramento Regional Transit District to provide for a retirement system if certain requirements are met. This bill would authorize the district to establish trust accounts for that purpose. (2) Existing law requires, commencing January 1, 2004, until completion of the seismic retrofit of specified state-owned toll bridges, the Department of Transportation to provide quarterly seismic reports to the transportation committees of both houses of the Legislature and to the California Transportation Commission for other seismic retrofit programs. This bill would delete this requirement. (3) Existing law provides for the California Transportation Commission to adopt locations for state highways on routes authorized by law, and provides for relinquishment of certain segments of state highways from the state to local agencies. This bill would provide for the relinquishment of the portion of Route 39 in the City of Buena Park and all of Route 225 in the City of Santa Barbara under certain terms and conditions. (4) Existing law authorizes the impoundment of a vehicle operating as a taxicab or other passenger vehicle for hire in violation of licensing requirements adopted by a local authority for a period of 30 days or less. Existing law requires an impoundment agency to release to the registered owner or his or her agency a vehicle so impounded prior to the expiration of the impoundment period under specified circumstances. This bill would additionally require the release of an impounded vehicle operating as a taxicab or other passenger vehicle for hire in violation of the licensing requirements if the vehicle is a rental car. Because a violation of this provision is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Oct 7, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 7, 2011 · Assembly Sep 9, 2011
How they voted
29–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
Sep 7, 2011
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Oct 7, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-1)
assembly
Sep 8, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3080.).
lower
Sep 7, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-2)
senate
Sep 7, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 25, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 25).
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 5).
upper
May 26, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 26, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 14, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 957
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 957. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline