Environment: CEQA exemption: housing projects.
Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA exempts infill housing projects meeting specified criteria, including, among other things, that a community-level environmental review was adopted or certified within 5 years of the date that the application for the project is deemed complete and the project promotes higher density infill housing. CEQA conclusively presumes that a project with a density of at least 20 units per acre promotes higher density infill housing. For the purposes of this exemption, CEQA defines "residential projects" to mean, among other things, a use consisting of residential units and primarily neighborhood-serving goods, services, or retail uses that do not exceed 15% of the total floor area of the project. This bill would instead exempt a project that may be used for neighborhood-serving goods, services, or retail uses to a level that does not exceed 25% of the total building square footage of the project. (2) Because this bill would require a lead agency to determine whether a housing project meets the above criteria to qualify for an exemption from CEQA, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) CEQA authorizes the use of a sustainable communities environmental assessment or modified environmental impact report for the purposes of CEQA for a transit priority project meeting specified requirements. This bill would authorize, until the adoption by a metropolitan planning organization of a sustainable communities strategy, the use of a sustainable communities environmental assessment or modified environmental impact report for a transit proximity project or an employment priority project meeting specified conditions. The bill would repeal this provision on January 1, 2015. The bill would authorize the use of a sustainable environmental assessment or modified environmental impact report for employment proximity projects meeting specified conditions. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Last action Sep 8, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly May 19, 2011
How they voted
70–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 72
May 19, 2011
D
Democratic45
97% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican26
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
6
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Sep 8, 2011
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on E.Q. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Sep 6, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Aug 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 6).
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
May 19, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-2)
assembly
May 12, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 11).
lower
Apr 28, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 26, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Lower · Passed
(H. & C.D. committee)
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and H. & C.D.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
RD
Roger Dickinson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 931
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 931. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline