Debtor exemptions: bankruptcy.
Summary
Existing law identifies property of a debtor that is exempt from all procedures for enforcement of a money judgment. Under existing law, those exemptions are available to a debtor in a federal bankruptcy case, whether a money judgment is being enforced by execution sale or other procedure, unless the debtor elects certain alternative exemptions. Existing law also provides that a specified portion of equity in a homestead, as defined, is exempt from execution to satisfy a judgment debt, and sets forth the amounts of the homestead exemptions available under specified circumstances. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to, every 3 years, adjust the amount of the exemptions described above based on the change in the annual California Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, as specified. This bill would increase the dollar amount of the exemptions for a debtor's interest in motor vehicles, jewelry, and implements, professional books, or tools of the trade of the debtor or the debtor's dependent. This bill would, beginning April 1, 2013, and every 3 years thereafter, require the Judicial Council to submit to the Legislature the amount by which the dollar amounts of the homestead exemptions described above may be adjusted based on the change in the annual California Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, as specified. This bill would also increase the amount of the homestead exemptions for persons 55 years of age or older who meet specified income criteria.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Sep 27, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 28, 2012 · Assembly May 19, 2011
How they voted
22–11
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 28, 2012
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
75% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
36
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Sep 27, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 23. Page 6529.).
lower
Aug 28, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-11-2)
senate
Aug 28, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 25, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (August 25).
upper
Jun 27, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 14, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 19, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (46-21-5)
assembly
May 12, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 3.) (May 11).
lower
Apr 26, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 929
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 929. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline