Jobs and Economic Improvement Through Environmental Leadership Act of 2011.
Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA establishes procedures for creating the administrative record judicial review procedure for any action or proceeding brought to challenge the lead agency's decision to certify the EIR or to grant project approvals. This bill would enact the Jobs and Economic Improvement Through Environmental Leadership Act of 2011 and establish specified judicial review procedures for the judicial review of the EIR and approvals granted for a leadership project related to the development of a residential, retail, commercial, sports, cultural, entertainment, or recreational use project, or clean renewable energy or clean energy manufacturing project. The act would authorize the Governor to certify a leadership project for streamlining pursuant to the act if certain conditions are met. The bill would repeal the act as of January 1, 2015. Because the lead agency would be required to use these alternative procedures for creating the administrative record if the project applicant so chooses and the project is certified by the Governor, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require, among other things, that the project create high-wage, highly skilled jobs and not result in any net additional emission of greenhouse gases, including greenhouse gas emissions from employee transportation. (2) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the act's unique and unprecedented streamlining benefits under the California Environmental Quality Act. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (4) This bill would become operative only if SB 292 is enacted and takes effect on or before January 1, 2012.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Sep 2011
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Signed Sep 27, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 10, 2011 · Assembly May 31, 2011
How they voted
24–6
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Sep 10, 2011
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
45% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
45
Key actions
9
Committee
10
Amendments
4
Sep 27, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-6-1)
senate
Sep 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
Measure version as amended on September 9 corrected.
lower
Sep 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 58. Noes 15. Page 3217.).
lower
Sep 9, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 9, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (September 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Sep 8, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 31, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-25-1)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27).
lower
May 27, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 11, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (May 2).
lower
Apr 27, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 13).
lower
Mar 14, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on ED. and NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 900
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 900. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline