Pupil rights: bullying.
Summary
Existing law provides that it is the policy of the state to afford all persons in public schools, regardless of their disability, gender, nationality, race or ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or any other characteristic that is contained in the definition of hate crimes, equal rights and opportunities in the educational institutions of the state, and that it is the purpose of existing law to prohibit acts that are contrary to that policy and to provide remedies therefor. Existing law requires the State Department of Education to develop a model handout, posted on appropriate department Internet Web sites, describing the rights and obligations set forth in these provisions and the policies addressing bias-related discrimination and harassment in schools. Existing law also requires the department to monitor adherence to these provisions and, as part of its regular monitoring and review of local educational agencies, to assess whether local educational agencies have adopted a policy that prohibits discrimination and harassment and a process for receiving and investigating complaints of discrimination and harassment, as specified. This bill would require the policy adopted by the local educational agencies to prohibit discrimination, harassment, intimidation, and bullying based on actual or perceived characteristics, as specified. The bill also would require the process for receiving and investigating complaints to include complaints of discrimination, harassment, intimidation, and bullying based on actual or perceived characteristics, as specified, and to include a requirement that school personnel who witness such acts take immediate steps to intervene when safe to do so, a timeline to investigate and resolve complaints, and an appeal process, as specified. The bill would make other conforming changes. Because this bill would require local educational agencies to perform additional duties, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the Superintendent of Public Instruction to post, and annually update, on his or her Internet Web site, and to provide to each school district, a list of statewide resources, including community-based organizations, that provide support to youth who have been subjected to school-based discrimination, harassment, intimidation, or bullying, and their families. The bill would make its provisions operative on July 1, 2012. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2010
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Dec 6, 2010
Signed Oct 9, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 2, 2011 · Assembly Jun 1, 2011
How they voted
22–12
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Sep 2, 2011
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
9
Committee
10
Amendments
4
Oct 9, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 7, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 26. Page 2961.).
lower
Sep 2, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-12-1)
senate
Sep 2, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 7 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 29, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (August 25).
upper
Jul 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 22, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 1, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-25-2)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27).
lower
May 4, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 27, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 13).
lower
Apr 7, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 22, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 21, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Dec 7, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 6.
lower
1 primary · 11 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TA
Tom Ammiano
DDemocratic
Co
CK
Christine Kehoe
DDemocratic
Co
FM
Fiona Ma
DDemocratic
Co
Isadore Hall
DDemocratic
Co
JB
Joan Buchanan
DDemocratic
Co
Leland Yee
DDemocratic
Co
MY
Mariko Yamada
DDemocratic
Co
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Co
Mike Gatto
DDemocratic
Co
Nancy Skinner
DDemocratic
Co
Richard Gordon
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 9
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 9. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline