Foster youth: identity theft.
Summary
Existing law requires a county welfare department to request a consumer disclosure, pursuant to federal law, on behalf of a youth in a foster care placement in the county when the youth reaches his or her 16th birthday, in order to ascertain whether the youth has been the victim of identity theft. If the consumer disclosure reveals any negative items or evidence that identity theft has occurred, existing law requires the county welfare department to refer the youth to an approved organization that provides services to victims of identity theft. Existing law requires the department to develop a list of approved organizations for this purpose, in consultation with the County Welfare Directors Association and others. This bill would revise these provisions to require the county welfare department or the State Department of Social Services to ascertain whether identity theft may have occurred under the described circumstances. The bill would authorize the county welfare department and the State Department of Social Services to refer the matter to a governmental agency or nonprofit organization that provides information and assistance to victims of identity theft. The bill would authorize the governmental agency or nonprofit organization to take remedial actions to clear the youth's credit record and to report the results to the county welfare department or the State Department of Social Services. The bill would require the Office of Privacy Protection, in consultation with the State Department of Social Services and other specified entities, to develop a list of governmental agencies and nonprofit organizations to which these matters may be referred for assistance in responding to an instance of suspected identity theft.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Last action Aug 25, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly May 19, 2011
How they voted
56–8
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 72
May 19, 2011
D
Democratic45
93% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican26
50% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
5
Committee
9
Aug 25, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Jun 27, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 15, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
May 19, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (56-8-8)
assembly
May 12, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 11).
lower
Apr 27, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
0 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 846
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 846. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline