Telecommunications: universal service: Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP).
Summary
(1) Existing law, the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, establishes a program of cooperative federalism for the regulation of telecommunications to attain the goal of local competition, while implementing specific, predictable, and sufficient federal and state mechanisms to preserve and advance universal service, consistent with certain universal service principles. Existing law authorizes the Public Utilities Commission to supervise and regulate every public utility in the state, including telephone corporations. Existing law establishes 6 funds in the State Treasury through which the state's universal service programs are funded. Under existing law, moneys in the funds may only be expended for specified purposes and upon appropriation in the annual Budget Act or upon supplemental appropriation. This bill would require the commission to require interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service providers to collect and remit surcharges on their California intrastate revenues in support of the universal service funds. (2) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Signed Oct 9, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Aug 29, 2011 · Assembly Jun 1, 2011
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Aug 29, 2011
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
75% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
10
Committee
11
Amendments
3
Oct 9, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Aug 29, 2011
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jul 12, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 11).
upper
Jun 21, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jun 1, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-3)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 27).
lower
May 24, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 12, 2011
Lower · Passed
Measure version as amended on May 11 corrected.
lower
May 12, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 10, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 9).
lower
May 9, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
May 4, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on U. & C. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Feb 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JB
Joan Buchanan
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 841
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 841. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline