Solid waste: plastic products.
Summary
Existing law requires rigid plastic packaging containers sold or offered for sale in this state to meet specified criteria, including, but not limited to, that the container be made from 25% postconsumer material. Existing law prohibits a person, on and after January 1, 2013, from selling a plastic product that is labeled as "biodegradable," "compostable," "degradable," or as otherwise specified, unless, at the time of the sale, the product meets the applicable ASTM standard specification or other specified certification requirements. These provisions are generally administered by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, and a city, a county, or the state may impose civil liability for a violation. This bill would require a manufacturer or supplier making an environmental marketing claim relating to the recycled content of a plastic food container product, as defined, to maintain certain information and documentation in support of that claim. The bill would require a manufacturer or supplier to furnish this information to any member of the public upon request or to provide the information and documentation by furnishing a link to a document on its Internet Web site. The bill would repeal these requirements on January 1, 2018.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Signed Sep 25, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 2, 2011
How they voted
50–13
Passed · 9 other
Total votes 72
Jun 2, 2011
D
Democratic45
91% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican26
50% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
10
Committee
12
Amendments
2
Sep 25, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 20. Page 6272.).
lower
Aug 20, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 22 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 2, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 19, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 8, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 27, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (50-13-9)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (May 27).
lower
May 12, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 10, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 2).
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BN
Brian Nestande
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 837
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 837. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline