Bikeways.
Summary
Existing law requires the Department of Transportation, in cooperation with county and city governments, to establish minimum safety design criteria for the planning and construction of bikeways, and authorizes cities, counties, and local agencies to establish bikeways. Existing law requires all city, county, regional, and other local agencies responsible for the development or operation of bikeways or roadways where bicycle travel is permitted to utilize all minimum safety design criteria and uniform specifications and symbols for signs, markers, and traffic control devices established pursuant to specified provisions of existing law. This bill would require the department to establish, by June 30, 2013, procedures for cities, counties, and local agencies to be granted exceptions from the requirement to use those criteria and specifications for purposes of research, experimentation, testing, evaluation, or verification. The bill would require the department, by November 1, 2014, to report to the transportation policy committees of both houses of the Legislature the steps that the department has taken to implement those requirements, including, but not limited to, information regarding requests received and granted by the department from July 1, 2013, to June 30, 2014, inclusive, for those exceptions, and the reasons the department rejected any requests for those exceptions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Jan 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Signed Sep 28, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2012 · Assembly Jan 26, 2012
How they voted
29–5
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Aug 20, 2012
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
50% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
12
Committee
12
Amendments
4
Sep 28, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 55. Noes 23. Page 6094.).
lower
Aug 20, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-5-1)
senate
Aug 20, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 22 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 13, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 6).
upper
Jul 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 3).
upper
Jun 12, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 3, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Feb 16, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Jan 26, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (48-20-4)
assembly
Jan 19, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (January 19).
lower
Jan 19, 2012
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jan 12, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 10, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 3.) (January 9).
lower
Jan 4, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 819
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 819. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline