AB 813 California Assembly · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Sex offenders: punishment: parole.

Summary
(1) Existing law creates the Sex Offender Management Board, within the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, empowered to address any issues, concerns, and problems related to the community management of adult sex offenders, including the main objective of the board to achieve safer communities by reducing victimization. The board is required, on or before July 1, 2011, to develop and update standards for certification of sex offender management professionals. This bill would give board members immunity from liability for their good faith conduct. The bill would provide that any person who knowingly provides false information in connection with an application for certification as a sex offender management professional would be subject to a civil penalty of up to $1,500, in addition to any other remedy available to the board, and would allow any public prosecutor to bring an action for a civil penalty in the name of the people of the State of California. The bill would also immunize certified sex offender management professionals and other specified professionals, as provided, from civil liability for any criminal acts committed by persons on parole, probation, or judicial commitment status who receive supervision or treatment. (2) Existing law requires every person who is required to register as a sex offender to be subject to assessment with the State-Authorized Risk Assessment Tool for Sex Offenders (SARATSO) and specifies that the SARATSO for adult males shall be the STATIC-99 risk assessment scale. Existing law establishes the SARATSO Review Committee, and requires the committee, on or before January 1, 2008, to determine whether the STATIC-99 should be supplemented with an actuarial instrument that measures dynamic risk factors or whether the STATIC-99 should be replaced with a different tool. Existing law requires the committee, on or before January 1, 2012, to select an actuarial instrument that measures dynamic risk factors and an actuarial instrument that measures the risk of future sexual violence. This bill would instead require the committee to determine whether the STATIC-99 should be supplemented with an empirically derived instrument, and would require the committee to select an empirically derived instrument that measures dynamic risk factors and an empirically derived instrument that measures risk of future violence. (3) The Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act requires, with specified exceptions, that all meetings of a state body be open and public and all persons be permitted to attend. This bill would exempt the board from the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act for purposes of discussing matters pertaining to the application of a sex offender treatment provider for certification, including review of an applicant's qualifications for certification. The bill would make related legislative findings and declarations. (4) This bill would make clarifying and conforming changes.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Jul 2011
Signed into Law
Sep 2011
Introduced Feb 17, 2011 Signed Sep 29, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Jul 14, 2011 · Assembly Aug 25, 2011

How they voted

280
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 31
Jul 14, 2011
D Democratic20
18 Yea 2
90% Yea
R Republican11
10 Yea 1
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
28
Key actions
9
Committee
11
Amendments
3
Sep 29, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 25, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-2)
assembly
Aug 25, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2542.).
lower
Jul 14, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-0-3)
senate
Jul 14, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 12 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 28, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 21, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 21).
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
upper
May 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 18).
lower
May 12, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 10, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 3).
lower
Apr 27, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Mar 17, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on G.O. and PUB. S.
lower
Feb 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
0 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors

No sponsor information available.