Courts: translators.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the clerk of the court, in a county with a population of 900,000 or more, to employ as many foreign language interpreters as are necessary to interpret in criminal and juvenile cases, and to translate documents intended for filing in any civil or criminal action or proceeding or for recordation in the county recorder's office, as specified. Existing law authorizes an interpreter so employed to collect from the litigants a specified fee for his or her services, and to deposit the fee into the county treasury. This bill would recast these provisions to authorize the clerk of the court to employ as many foreign language interpreters as may be necessary to interpret cases in the superior court, and to translate documents as specified. The bill would require the clerk of the court to assign interpreters when needed to interpret in criminal and juvenile delinquency cases in the superior court, and in civil cases if an assignment can be made without causing the court to be unable to perform its obligations in criminal proceedings. The bill would delete the authorization for the collection of a fee.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Last action Aug 25, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly May 26, 2011
How they voted
68–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 72
May 26, 2011
D
Democratic45
93% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican26
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Aug 25, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Jul 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 23, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 21).
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 26, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-4)
assembly
May 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 18).
lower
May 9, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 4, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 26).
lower
Mar 22, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Donald Wagner
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 810
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 810. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline