Political Reform Act of 1974: lobbyists.
Summary
Existing law, the Political Reform Act of 1974, requires the Secretary of State to establish and maintain on the Internet an updated Directory of Lobbyists, Lobbying Firms, and Lobbyist Employers. The act further requires lobbyist employers and persons making certain payments to influence legislative or administrative actions to file periodic reports disclosing, among other information, their lobbying interests. This bill would require that the online directory maintained by the Secretary of State also contain information regarding lobbying interests. The bill would require that the periodic reports filed by lobbyist employers and other persons contain, in addition to their lobbying interests, the bill numbers of any legislation lobbied during the reporting period. The bill would also require the Secretary of State to display on his or her Internet Web site, within 90 days of the end of each calendar quarter, a list of the lobbying interests containing a specific reference to a bill number, accompanied by a list of all lobbyist employers who reported each of those lobbying interests, reported for the prior calendar quarter. Existing law makes a knowing or willful violation of the Political Reform Act of 1974 a misdemeanor and subjects offenders to criminal penalties. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating additional crimes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Dec 20, 2010
Last action Aug 15, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly May 31, 2011
How they voted
68–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 70
May 31, 2011
D
Democratic44
97% Yea
R
Republican26
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
5
Committee
9
Aug 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jul 5, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 16, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
May 31, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-2)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 27).
lower
Apr 6, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 16, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 27, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Dec 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 20.
lower
Dec 20, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
AH
Alyson Huber
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 71
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 71. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline