Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority.
Summary
Existing law creates the Pasadena Metro Blue Line Construction Authority for purposes relating to the development of a light rail project extending from the City of Los Angeles to the Cities of Pasadena and Claremont. Existing law provides that the authority shall be governed by a board consisting of 5 voting members and one nonvoting member and requires the authority to adopt a code of conduct for officers and board members of the authority that, among other things, specifies circumstances under which a board member shall be deemed to have a financial interest in a decision. This bill would redefine the authority as the Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority for purposes of these provisions. The bill would provide that the board shall consist of 5 voting members and 3 nonvoting members, would require the additional 2 nonvoting members to be appointed by the City Councils of the Cities of Pasadena and South Pasadena, as specified, and would require each appointing authority to also appoint an alternate member, as specified. The bill would also specify circumstances under which board members and alternate members of the authority shall not be considered financially interested and may participate in decisions and agreements regarding the authority, any appointing authority, and any extension city, as defined. The bill would provide that a board member may simultaneously hold specified governmental positions without the holding of those positions constituting an incompatible office or activity, as specified. Because the bill would impose new duties on local agencies, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Signed Oct 7, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 6, 2011 · Assembly Sep 9, 2011
How they voted
31–0
Passed
Total votes 31
Sep 6, 2011
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
9
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Oct 7, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-4-2)
assembly
Sep 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 74. Noes 4. Page 3177.).
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (September 8).
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 7, 2011
Upper · Passed
Measure version as amended on September 1 corrected.
upper
Sep 6, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0)
senate
Aug 31, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
upper
Aug 30, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 23, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 12, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Apr 25, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 25).
lower
Mar 7, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
lower
Feb 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 706
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 706. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline