Disorderly conduct.
Summary
Existing law establishes the offense of disorderly conduct to include specified invasions of privacy, and makes the offense a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding 6 months, or by a fine not exceeding $1,000, or by both that fine and imprisonment. This bill would, for those specified invasions of privacy, make a 2nd or subsequent violation, or for a first violation of these provisions if the victim of the violation was a minor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding $2,000, or by both that fine and imprisonment. By increasing the penalty for an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Signed Oct 9, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 7, 2011 · Assembly Sep 9, 2011
How they voted
29–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
Sep 7, 2011
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Oct 9, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-1)
assembly
Sep 8, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3066.).
lower
Sep 7, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-2)
senate
Sep 7, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 21, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 26, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 13, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 11, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 5).
lower
Mar 7, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
NT
Norma Torres
DDemocratic
Co
CD
Curren D Price
DDemocratic
Co
CH
Curt Hagman
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 665
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 665. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline