Infrastructure financing districts: America's Cup venues.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the City and County of San Francisco to create infrastructure financing districts, including districts that include specified waterfront property, adopt infrastructure financing plans for those districts, and issue bonds financed by projected increases in ad valorem property taxes to fund certain public facilities, pursuant to a specified procedure. Existing property tax law establishes various procedures and requirements with respect to the annual apportionment and allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, including increased revenues from these infrastructure financing districts. This bill would authorize the adoption under these provisions of financing plans for special waterfront districts that include the waterfront area in the City and County of San Francisco designated as the America's Cup venues, and the use of specified tax revenues produced in the districts for the construction of the Port of San Francisco's maritime facilities at Pier 27, improvement of publicly held waterfront lands used as viewing sites, and other matters, subject to specified allocation procedures. It would require the county board of supervisors to submit a fiscal analysis to the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank for review and approval before adopting the resolution authorizing the issuance of debt pursuant to these provisions. The bill would exempt the issuance of tax increment bonds in a waterfront district from local voter approval requirements and would authorize those bonds to be sold at a negotiated sale. The bill would enact other related provisions. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City and County of San Francisco.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Sep 2011
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Signed Sep 23, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 7, 2011 · Assembly May 31, 2011
How they voted
25–5
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 35
Sep 7, 2011
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican12
41% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
12
Committee
13
Amendments
4
Sep 23, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 1. Page 3199.).
lower
Sep 9, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 7, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-5-5)
senate
Aug 30, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (August 25).
upper
Aug 22, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 6).
upper
Jul 1, 2011
Upper · Passed
Measure version as amended on June 29 corrected.
upper
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jun 6, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 31, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-1)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 27).
lower
May 11, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 28, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 26, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 14, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 29, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 7, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TA
Tom Ammiano
DDemocratic
Co
FM
Fiona Ma
DDemocratic
Co
Jerry Hill
DDemocratic
Co
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Co
Richard Gordon
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 664
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 664. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline