Elections: statewide ballot pamphlet.
Summary
The Political Reform Act of 1974 requires the Legislative Analyst to prepare an impartial analysis of each initiative measure to appear on the ballot, and provides that the Legislative Analyst is solely responsible for determining the content of the analysis. The act requires the Legislative Analyst to prepare an unbiased fiscal analysis of a measure that is included in the ballot pamphlet stating whether the measure would increase or decrease any revenue or cost to state or local government. Existing law also requires the Legislative Analyst to prepare for inclusion in the ballot pamphlet a summary statement regarding the general meaning and effect of "yes" and "no" votes on each state measure. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative statute, generally provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. The act also provides that, notwithstanding this requirement, the Legislature may without restriction amend specified provisions of the act to add to the ballot pamphlet information regarding candidates or other information. This bill would, except as specified, require, if a fiscal analysis prepared by the Legislative Analyst determines that a measure would provide an increase in revenues to fund new or existing programs, that specified language be added at the end of the "yes" and "no" summary statement in the ballot pamphlet advising that the revenue generated by the measure will be forever dedicated to the purposes specified in the measure unless the measure is changed by a future measure approved by the voters. The bill also would contain a finding and declaration of the Legislature that the bill permits or requires additional information to be included in the ballot pamphlet in accordance with the provision of the Political Reform Act of 1974 described above that authorizes the Legislature to add information to the ballot pamphlet.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2010
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
Apr 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Vetoed
Oct 2011
Introduced Dec 9, 2010
Vetoed Oct 7, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 7, 2011 · Assembly Apr 11, 2011
How they voted
26–2
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 31
Sep 7, 2011
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
63% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
35
Key actions
13
Committee
14
Amendments
3
Oct 7, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 62. Noes 14. Page 3197.).
lower
Sep 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (September 9).
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 7, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-2-3)
senate
Sep 7, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 23, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
upper
Aug 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 12, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (July 5).
upper
Jun 14, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 6, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 25, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Apr 11, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-23-3)
assembly
Apr 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (April 6).
lower
Mar 23, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 21, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (March 15).
lower
Feb 3, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Jan 27, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Dec 10, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 9.
lower
Dec 9, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike Gatto
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 65
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 65. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline