Court interpreters.
Summary
Existing law requires, when a witness is incapable of understanding the English language or expressing himself or herself in the English language so as to be understood directly by counsel, court, and jury, an interpreter to be sworn to interpret for him or her. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to conduct a study of language and interpreter use and need in court proceedings, with commentary, and to report its findings and recommendations to the Governor and to the Legislature every 5 years. Existing law requires that this study serve as the basis for determining the need to establish interpreter programs and certification and for establishing these programs and examinations through the normal budgetary process. This bill would enact the California Language Access Bill of Rights. The bill would provide that a person who is unable to understand English, and who is charged with a crime, has the right to a competent interpreter provided by the court to provide exclusive and ongoing interpretation services throughout the proceedings. The bill would provide that a person who is charged with a crime, and for whom a noncertified, nonregistered interpreter has been appointed, has a right to object to the interpreter at any time during the proceeding that the interpreter appears to be unqualified. The bill would require the court to record specified information and to follow all procedures required pursuant to court rule. The bill would prohibit a noninterpreter staff person of the court, or any person employed by the sheriff, probation department, prosecutor, jail, or corrections department of the prosecuting city or county from providing interpreter services during a proceeding. The bill would permit the rights provided pursuant to these provisions only to be waived expressly by the person charged if the waiver is affirmatively shown to be intelligent and voluntary. The bill also would set forth legislative findings and declarations relating to ensuring an adequate supply of court interpreters without sacrificing essential standards for certification.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 16, 2011
Last action Aug 25, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 1, 2011
How they voted
45–23
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 72
Jun 1, 2011
D
Democratic45
97% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican26
84% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
6
Committee
12
Amendments
2
Aug 25, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 15, 2011
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 27, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 1, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-23-4)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27).
lower
May 18, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 11, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (May 3).
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 17, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
WT
Warren T Furutani
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 618
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 618. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline