Sentencing.
Summary
Existing law, as amended by Proposition 21, adopted March 7, 2000, and by Proposition 83, adopted November 7, 2006, provides for a list of crimes called "violent felonies" and "serious felonies." Other existing law provides specified enhancements to the punishments of certain repeat, state-prison bound offenders with prior violent or serious felony convictions. The initiative statutes provide that any amendment of these provisions by the Legislature shall require a 23 vote of the membership of each house. Existing law defines battery as any willful or unlawful use of force or violence upon the person of another. Existing law provides that battery committed against a custodial officer, firefighter, emergency medical technician, lifeguard, process server, traffic officer, or animal control officer engaged in the performance of his or her duties, as specified, is punishable as a misdemeanor or a felony. Existing law provides that battery against a peace officer, as specified, is punishable as a misdemeanor or a felony. This bill would add felony battery against the above-named persons to the list of "serious felonies" and to the list of "violent felonies." Existing law specifies, for purposes of the sentence enhancements specified above, that the statutes comprising the lists of violent and serious felonies be interpreted as they existed at the time the provisions were enacted, including amendments made to those statutes during the 2005–06 Regular Session of the Legislature, as specified. This bill would likewise require those statutes to be interpreted as they would be amended following the enactment of this bill for purposes of sentence enhancements. By expanding the punishments for existing crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2010
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Dec 7, 2010
Last action Jan 17, 2012
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
3
Committee
6
Apr 6, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 22, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 1, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 27, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Dec 8, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 7.
lower
Dec 7, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 14 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
KD
Kevin D Jeffries
RRepublican
Co
Bill Emmerson
RRepublican
Co
BN
Brian Nestande
RRepublican
Co
CC
Connie Conway
RRepublican
Co
CH
Curt Hagman
RRepublican
Co
DL
Diane L Harkey
RRepublican
Co
Donald Wagner
RRepublican
Co
JM
Jeff Miller
RRepublican
Co
Jim Nielsen
RRepublican
Co
JS
Jim Silva
RRepublican
Co
LH
Linda Halderman
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 60
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 60. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline