Unemployment compensation: employer: motion picture industry.
Summary
Existing unemployment insurance law requires any employing unit that is a motion picture payroll services company, as defined, to be treated as an employer of a motion picture production worker, as defined, and to file a statement of intent with the Employment Development Department. Existing law requires any employment unit operating as a motion picture payroll services company that quits business to file with the director a final return and report of wages, as provided, and to notify the motion picture production companies and allied motion picture services of its intent to quit business, as provided. Existing law requires the employing unit's status to be applied to its affiliated entities, as defined. Existing law requires the director to notify an entity, as provided, that does not satisfy the requirements of a motion picture payroll services company, as provided, of the facts and circumstances upon which the determination was made. Existing law authorizes the department to make a specified report to the Legislature. Existing law repeals these provisions on January 1, 2012. This bill would delete the authorization of the department to make the report and the January 1, 2012, repeal date.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2010
Committee Review
Jul 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Jul 2011
Signed into Law
Aug 2011
Introduced Dec 6, 2010
Signed Aug 3, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Jul 11, 2011 · Assembly May 2, 2011
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Jul 11, 2011
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Aug 3, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 11, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Jul 11, 2011
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 27, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 12, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
May 2, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-5)
assembly
Apr 13, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 13).
lower
Mar 30, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (March 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Dec 7, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 6.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike Gatto
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 55
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 55. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline