Electronic toll collection systems: information use.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the development and implementation of various electronic bridge and highway toll collection mechanisms. Existing law prohibits a transportation agency, as defined, from selling or providing personally identifiable information of a person obtained pursuant to the person's participation in an electronic toll collection system or use of a toll facility that uses an electronic toll collection system, subject to specified exceptions. Existing law requires a transportation agency that uses an electronic toll collection system to establish a privacy policy regarding the collection and storage of personally identifiable information in that regard, to provide the policy to subscribers, and to post the policy on its Internet Web site. Existing law permits a transportation agency to share data collected via an electronic toll collection system with another transportation agency solely to comply with interoperablility specifications and standards for electronic toll collection devices. Existing law also permits a transportation agency to perform billing and other financial functions necessary to operate and manage toll facilities. This bill would permit a transportation agency or its designee to share data regarding a vehicle's use of toll facilities with another transportation agency, whether in the state or not, solely to comply with the above specifications and standards. This bill would also permit a transportation agency to share specified information with transportation agencies in other states as part of a nationwide interoperability toll collection program. This bill would also permit a transportation agency to perform toll collection and violation enforcement functions required to operate and manage toll facilities, whether in the state or not.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jul 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 16, 2011
Last action Jul 3, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 9, 2011
How they voted
54–11
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 71
May 9, 2011
D
Democratic45
93% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican25
44% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
8
Committee
12
Jul 3, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, final hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 21, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 1, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 19, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 9, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (54-11-6)
assembly
May 4, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (May 3).
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 12, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 11). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 6, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 7, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and PUB. S.
lower
Feb 17, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
DW
Das Williams
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 539
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 539. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline